Delegates on Table 16 at the opening plenary are invited to record their thoughts here. 

After a number of good debates around the meaning and value of 'inquiry-based learning', we came up with a number of individual questions...

How do we evaluate the network connections - are they helpful/any good/of value or a waste of time?

Is IBL really a smokescreen for feeding the employability agenda and 'UK plc'?

What are the politics of the language that is being used, for example, 'networks', 'synergies', etc. and what implications do they have for how 'IBL' is practiced?

What are the potentials for critical research learning in formal university contexts?

Does methodology limit innovation? What is the balance between too much direction and too little? Does it differ by level of study?

How do we keep inquiry networks to manageable scale?

Have you got a wiki side?